Back to Evidence DeskYSR Congress Party
ENతెలుగు
CASE 06Cross-sport support mismatch

Highest-achievement and backup records compared · Volleyball / Kabaddi · 1 candidate record

How did a junior Kabaddi certificate support an Inter-University Volleyball achievement?

COMPLETE CASE NARRATIVE

What happened, from record to consequence

The record concerns D. Ramadevi, candidate ID SDSC0002615. The highest-achievement screenshot identifies an Inter-University Volleyball merit certificate connected to Sri Venkateswara University. The lower-level supporting screenshot is labelled School Games Federation, junior under-19 Kabaddi, 2003.

The two documents are not two levels of the same sporting path: one is Volleyball at university level and the other is Kabaddi at school-junior level. G.O.Ms.No.47 says a higher-level achievement must be supported by the applicable lower-level participation or medal record. The evaluation file must therefore explain how a different sport was accepted as the supporting progression.

The proof bundle supplied here contains the record screenshots and undertaking page, but the signed evaluator reasoning is not visible. The answer requires the complete application, source-verification replies, checklist and final approval that placed this candidate in the priority and selection process.

RECORDS EXAMINED

Candidates covered by this case

Selection / districtCandidate IDNameReference
Sports-quota recordSDSC0002615D. RamadeviVolleyball / Kabaddi
DOCUMENTED FACTS

The record, point by point

  • Candidate ID SDSC0002615 is identified in the supplied record.
  • The highest achievement is labelled Inter-University Volleyball.
  • The backup is labelled under-19 Kabaddi, 2003.
  • The documents belong to different sports and different competition levels.
WHY THIS MATTERS

Sports-quota priority depends on a traceable progression of achievement. Accepting an unrelated sport as the lower-level support can alter eligibility and displace another candidate in a limited quota.

RECORDS THAT MUST BE RELEASED

Publish the complete application, both source-verification replies, rule interpretation, evaluator checklist, priority calculation, signed recommendation and final selection approval.

EVIDENCE MAP

Description first, supporting documents next

  1. C6-N1Pages 1-2 - complete bilingual case narrative, candidate list and documented facts
  2. C6-E1Page 3 - highest-achievement and backup screenshots
  3. C6-E2Page 4 - undertaking / supporting record page