Who controlled the complete examination chain?
Publish the orders assigning paper-setting, encrypted upload, examination delivery, result processing and database access - with role separation and access logs.
YS Jagan's challenge · order an independent probe
AP DSCSCAM?
“Justice may be delayed, but it cannot be denied.”— YS Jagan Mohan Reddy · 03 Jun 2026
16,347 posts released. About 3,12,429 candidates appeared. 15,941 were selected and issued appointment orders. The records must explain how the examination, merit and sports-quota stages were handled - and every deserving candidate must receive justice.
16,347posts released
3,12,429*appeared for exams
15,941selected / appointed
*Approximate attendance count calculated from 3,36,307 registered candidates and the published 92.90% attendance rate. The final figure is the 15,941 candidates selected and issued appointment orders.
Documents compared page by pageSix cases, with the supporting records.
THE SIX QUESTIONS
Questions the government record must answer
These are investigation questions, not verdicts. Each one is paired with the exact public record required to test it.
Which merit list is the authoritative version?
The portal available today does not answer historical version questions. Publish timestamped lists, hashes, change approvals and reconciliation with final selections.
Was SMS only an alert in every case?
The government says yes; candidates allege inadequate public disclosure. Release communication logs, district display records and grievance notices.
How were sports records authenticated?
Publish the rule hierarchy, evaluator checklists, source-registry confirmations, signed decisions and every approved replacement.
Why did the sports-quota framework change?
Explain the move from 2% to 3%, the no-competitive-exam framework, the recognized-sports list and any later reversal or qualification change.
Why oppose an independent audit?
A CBI or sitting-judge inquiry can secure records, hear both sides, test each allegation and protect innocent candidates from trial by publicity.
END-TO-END DSC AUDIT MAP
Seven control points. One traceable record chain.
This map identifies where normal verification safeguards should operate and the exact record required to test whether each safeguard worked. It does not presume that a failure occurred.
Authority & role assignment
Separate incompatible duties and approve named access.
Appointment orders, role matrix and access approvalsQuestion preparation & delivery
Dual control, encryption and immutable access logs.
Author logs, encryption events, vendor scope and incident recordCBT examination
Randomization, normalization controls and session auditability.
Session logs, question-bank versions and normalization methodResult processing
Version control, maker-checker approval and reconciliation.
Processing scripts, hashes, approvals and change historyMerit, roster & public notice
Timestamped lists, public availability and reasoned status.
Every list version, display proof, SMS logs and final reconciliationCertificate & sports verification
Decision-date rule, source-register check and signed evaluation.
Applications, checklists, source replies, roster and replacementsSelection & grievance remedy
A traceable decision, notice, review and correction path.
Selected/rejected files, reasons, grievance orders and outcomesTwo-minute evidence brief
Open press centreRead the six central questions, compare the candidate concerns with the government response, and then open any case for its complete narration and supporting documents. Official YS Jagan statements are collected in the press centre.
THE RECRUITMENT RECORD
How the controversy developed
A dated sequence separating official process milestones, government responses and YSRCP interventions.
PUBLIC RECORD
Recruitment process initiated
Government reporting identifies G.O. No.27 as the formal start of the recruitment process.
RULE CHANGE
Three-percent sports quota introduced
G.O.Ms.No.4 and G.O.Ms.No.47 created the 3% horizontal-reservation framework for eligible meritorious sportspersons without a written competitive examination.
PUBLIC RECORD
Mega DSC notification
The School Education Department released the notification for 16,347 teacher posts.
PUBLIC RECORD
Computer-based examinations
Out of 3,36,307 registered candidates, the published attendance rate was 92.90%, equal to approximately 3,12,429 people appearing for the examinations.
PUBLIC RECORD
Results released
Candidate scorecards and qualifying status were released before merit and certificate-verification stages.
PUBLIC RECORD
Final selections released
15,941 candidates were selected and issued appointment orders; 406 of the 16,347 notified posts remained unfilled.
YSRCP
Candidates place grievances before YS Jagan
DSC aspirants presented recruitment concerns and sought political and legal support.
YSRCP
Merit, examination-control and sports-quota questions placed on record
YSRCP statements sought publication of recruitment records and demanded an independent CBI investigation.
YSRCP
YS Jagan renews the CBI challenge
YS Jagan challenged the government to place DSC-2025 before an independent CBI inquiry.
EVIDENCE DESK
Download complete evidence bookSix complete case narratives + supporting proofs
6 of 6 case files shown
CASE 01Event-record contradiction
Candidate certificates and association letters compared
How were certificates issued for a senior event the associations say was not held in Khammam?
CASE SUMMARY
Four candidate files cite a Senior Inter-District Judo Championship at Khammam on 19-21 October 2013. Letters from the Telangana Judo Association and Khammam District Judo Association state that only a junior event was held there on those dates and that the senior-event claim does not match their records.
WHY THIS MATTERS
A sports-quota certificate can be assessed only against the real event register, category, medal list and issuing authority. Here, the central event detail is contradicted by both association letters.
12 pages · 3.6 MB
SHA-256 66113a3819ee…4c1469CASE 02Date and format conflict
Five candidate certificates compared with event records
Why do five certificates show different dates and a different format for the 2014 judo event?
CASE SUMMARY
Five candidate certificates show 11-13 November 2014. The comparison certificates supplied for the event show 28-29 November 2014 and a visibly different certificate design.
WHY THIS MATTERS
Event dates and certificate serials are basic authentication points. If either is wrong, the sports achievement and its place in the priority list must be rechecked from the issuing association's original register.
13 pages · 3.7 MB
SHA-256 a44491e058c3…7de459CASE 03Duplicate silver position
Two certificates compared side by side
How can two candidates hold second place in the same age and weight division?
CASE SUMMARY
Two certificates show the same Vijayawada tournament, 1 December 2019, +15 age group, men's -81 kg division and second place - but name different candidates.
WHY THIS MATTERS
The medal position affects sports-quota priority. A duplicated silver entry can change the order in which candidates are considered for a limited number of posts.
4 pages · 2.1 MB
SHA-256 e27a6a816a0a…4ed9a7CASE 04Material file replacement
Earlier and later record sets compared
Who replaced the backup certificate in candidate SDSC0013069, and under what authority?
CASE SUMMARY
The earlier set contains a boxing backup certificate in another person's name and a blank sports-achievement undertaking. The later set contains boxing documents in the candidate's own name.
WHY THIS MATTERS
Changing a supporting certificate can change eligibility and priority. Equal treatment requires the same correction window, documentation and approval rule for every candidate.
7 pages · 1.2 MB
SHA-256 34a5f99f7fc8…eb1853CASE 05Earlier version record required
Submitted case note compared with current candidate file
The case note alleges a Kho-Kho backup, but why does the current file show Kabaddi for both records?
CASE SUMMARY
The submitted case note describes a 2022 Kho-Kho backup and a court-directed reconsideration. The supplied current PDF instead shows a 2005 Kabaddi highest achievement and a 2004 Kabaddi backup in chronological order.
WHY THIS MATTERS
This case tests whether the portal file changed between initial selection, court-directed consideration and final appointment. A dated version history can confirm or disprove that sequence.
4 pages · 2.1 MB
SHA-256 7ed1b215cb47…d69396CASE 06Cross-sport support mismatch
Highest-achievement and backup records compared
How did a junior Kabaddi certificate support an Inter-University Volleyball achievement?
CASE SUMMARY
The supplied record for candidate SDSC0002615 pairs an Inter-University Volleyball merit certificate as the highest achievement with a School Games Federation under-19 Kabaddi certificate from 2003 as the backup.
WHY THIS MATTERS
Sports-quota priority depends on a traceable progression of achievement. Accepting an unrelated sport as the lower-level support can alter eligibility and displace another candidate in a limited quota.
4 pages · 545 KB
SHA-256 4d457945c447…c82e29CLAIM · RESPONSE · AUDIT
The other side is part of the record
No allegation is presented as a concluded fact. The decisive column is the independent record required to test both positions.
IssueCandidate concernGovernment responseIndependent audit required
Merit records
Lists changed or were not fully visible at the relevant time.
Government says IDs, marks, ranks, categories and local status were published; SMS was only an alert.
Timestamped list archive, hashes, collectorate display proof and final-selection reconciliation.
Exam control
Critical responsibilities were concentrated and role separation failed.
Government cites CBT, encrypted delivery, randomized banks and security controls.
Appointment orders, access-control matrix, audit logs, incident reports and vendor scope.
Sports quota
Rule changes and certificate anomalies displaced deserving candidates.
Government says credentials were independently verified under the applicable framework.
All selected/rejected files, source-register checks, evaluator notes, roster and rule interpretation.
RULEBOOK & RECORD REQUEST
The rules must be read in sequence
A fair audit must identify which rule applied on each decision date - not apply a later rule retrospectively.
G.O.Ms.No.74
Sports-reservation framework cited by APPSC for eligibility certification.
Official APPSC noteG.O.Rt.No.473
Amended the earlier sports-reservation certificate framework for specified posts.
Open official PDFG.O.Ms.No.4 + 47
These orders set out the 3% horizontal sports reservation and the certificate-verification procedure applied to the 2025 recruitment. Open both PDFs below.
What must accompany every selection
Application version, source verification, evaluator checklist, rule relied upon, roster point, approval and any replacement history.
See investigation terms
Privacy-first player: no Facebook request is made until a video is selected. Facebook terms apply after loading.
OFFICIAL YS JAGAN VIDEO ARCHIVE · JUN–AUG 2026
The demand: let an independent agency test every record
The two official addresses connect examination control, merit-list transparency, grievance failures and sports-quota rule changes. This website converts those political claims into records an investigator can obtain and test.
KEY THEMES / ACCESSIBLE BILINGUAL SUMMARY
- Separation of duties in examination management
- Historical merit-list and candidate-notification records
- Sports-quota policy changes and authentication
- CBI inquiry or independent judicial investigation
The official sources do not publish a verified time-coded transcript. This is a paraphrased accessibility brief, not a verbatim transcript; the complete official written statements are linked below.
OFFICIAL PHOTO & PRESS ARCHIVE
One issue. A dated public record.
Every photograph below comes from the official YSRCP website and carries its event context and source link.
YS Jagan challenges the government to order a CBI probe
Official YSRCP - Tadepalli
Official storyPhoto
Detailed address on the Mega DSC records and CBI-probe demand
Official YSRCP press meet
Official storyPhoto
Candidates explain recruitment grievances to YS Jagan
Official YSRCP - Central Office
Official storyPhoto
Aspirants place their concerns directly before YS Jagan
Official YSRCP - Tadepalli
Official storyPhoto
The renewed challenge: submit DSC-2025 to independent scrutiny
Official YSRCP media address - Tadepalli
Official storyPhoto
DSC press and action archive
YS Jagan renews the CBI challengeChallenges the government to submit DSC-2025 to an independent inquiry.Detailed DSC press statementExam control, merit records, sports quota and the demand for a CBI probe.DSC Action Committee decisionLegal support, representation to the Governor and continued publication of DSC records.Candidates present grievances to YS JaganCandidate accounts, legal-panel assurance and a future Commission of Inquiry pledge.Full disclosure demandedDistrict merit lists, final selections, rejected applications and sports-quota records.421 sports-quota records questionedCalls for publication of certificates and the governing selection record.THE HUMAN COST
A rank, verification and call letter must end in a reasoned decision
Official YSRCP reporting says candidates from several districts described completing verification and interviews yet appearing in neither selected nor rejected lists. Those accounts remain allegations until tested against individual files - but every candidate is entitled to a traceable decision and an effective grievance remedy.
Read the official candidate-meeting accountTERMS OF THE DEMANDED INQUIRY
CBI or sitting-judge investigation
The purpose is not trial by website. It is preservation and examination of the official record by an authority independent of the process under challenge.
- 01Secure question-paper, access, encryption, vendor and result-processing logs.
- 02Preserve every merit-list, roster and selection-list version with hashes and approvals.
- 03Audit all sports-quota applications against source registers and the rule applicable on the decision date.
- 04Hear candidates, government officials, verification bodies and technology providers fairly.
- 05Publish findings, protect innocent candidates and provide lawful remedies where injustice is established.
SUBMIT A RECORD OR CORRECTION
Submit evidence or request a correction
Describe the record, the relevant case and who can verify it. Do not include Aadhaar numbers, home addresses, private phone numbers or unrelated academic records. You can also write directly to the AP DSC SCAM evidence desk.
helpdesk@apdscscam.comAP DSC SCAM evidence deskServer-side validation and sanitizationDurable rate limiting, timing check and bot trapNo front-end secretsFile upload remains closed pending secure storage and malware scanning
SOURCE REGISTER
Every public claim must remain traceable
Sources were rechecked on 29 August 2026. Official documents are preferred; media reports are labelled where an official record is not yet available.
01
YSRCP · 20 Aug 2026YS Jagan's CBI challenge on DSC and Group I
02YSRCP · 13 Jun 2026YS Jagan's detailed DSC statement and investigation demand
03YSRCP · 03 Jun 2026Candidate grievances presented to YS Jagan
04YSRCP · 02 Jun 2026Demand to publish merit-list and sports-quota records
05OFFICIAL · CurrentGovernment Mega DSC selection-list portal
06OFFICIAL · CurrentGovernment Mega DSC general merit-list portal
07GOVERNMENT ORDER · 19 Apr 2025G.O.Ms.No.4 - three-percent sports-reservation guidelines (PDF)
08GOVERNMENT ORDER · 19 Apr 2025G.O.Ms.No.47 - service-rule amendment and verification framework (PDF)
09OFFICIAL · 2012 / 2018APPSC sports-quota eligibility note and earlier cited orders
10GOVERNMENT RESPONSE · 31 May 2026Education Secretary's response reported by The New Indian Express
11RESULT DATA · 16 Sep 202515,941 selections out of 16,347 notified posts
12ATTENDANCE DATA · 12 Aug 20253,36,307 registered candidates and 92.90% attendance