Back to Evidence Desk
AP DSC SCAMEVIDENCE · ACCOUNTABILITY
ENతెలుగు
Vijayawada 2014 · Date and format conflictDate and format mismatch

Sports-quota certificate verification · Judo

Why do five certificate sets for one 2014 Judo championship carry different dates and a different format?

Five anonymised certificate sets describe a Senior Inter-District Judo Championship in Vijayawada from 11–13 November 2014. The supplied reference merit and participation certificates describe the first senior inter-district event on 28–29 November 2014 and use a visibly different design, wording and signature layout.

Open complete evidence PDF
THE CORE COMPARISON

The discrepancy at a glance

01Five questioned sets say

Senior Inter-District Judo Championship · Vijayawada · 11–13 Nov 2014

02Reference certificates say

First Senior Inter-District Men & Women Judo Championship · Vijayawada · 28–29 Nov 2014

03Visible document difference

Different heading, border, wording, venue line and signature layout

COMPLETE RECORD NARRATIVE

From the documents to the unanswered question

01

What the five sets show

The five anonymised sets use a black-and-white certificate design and print the championship dates as 11–13 November 2014 at Vijayawada. Each set contains a merit or participation record. Personal fields have been permanently covered in the public copies.

02

What the reference set shows

The supplied reference merit and participation certificates use a coloured association header, describe the event as the first senior inter-district championship and carry the dates 28–29 November 2014. Their wording, border and signature arrangement differ from the five questioned sets.

03

The unanswered verification question

Were two separate senior events conducted in Vijayawada that month, or does one set fail to match the association’s source record? The answer should come from the event register, certificate serial register and the written verification trail used during recruitment.

WHAT THE FILES ESTABLISH
  • Five anonymised sets print 11–13 November 2014; the two supplied reference certificates print 28–29 November 2014.
  • The two groups differ visibly in title treatment, border, wording, venue line and signature placement.
  • The public packet shows the comparison while removing applicant names and identifying fields.
WHY IT MATTERS

A date or format difference alone does not decide authenticity. But when eligibility may depend on the certificate, the issuing body’s register and written confirmation must explain the discrepancy before selection is treated as verified.

RECORDS THAT MUST BE RELEASED

Release the 2014 event register, certificate serial register, organiser file, association verification replies, examiner notes and final approval record for the five anonymised sets.

PERMANENTLY ANONYMISED EXHIBITS

Inspect the supporting records

Names, candidate IDs, dates of birth, family details, signatures and other identifying information are permanently removed from these public copies.

Vijayawada 2014 · Date and format conflict · Evidence packet13 pages · 2.4 MB · SHA-256 e6c4656af13e…
Download PDF