Back to Evidence Desk
AP DSC SCAMEVIDENCE · ACCOUNTABILITY
ENతెలుగు
Khammam 2013 · Junior/senior record conflictAssociation records conflict

Sports-quota certificate verification · Judo

How did senior-event certificates emerge for dates the associations describe as a junior-only Khammam meet?

Four anonymised certificate sets describe a Senior Inter-District Judo Championship at Khammam from 19–21 October 2013. Two supplied association letters say the Khammam event in that period was for juniors and place the state senior championship in Hyderabad on 28–29 December 2013.

Open complete evidence PDF
THE CORE COMPARISON

The discrepancy at a glance

01Certificates say

Senior Inter-District Judo Championship · Khammam · 19–21 Oct 2013

02State association letter says

The Khammam meet in that period was junior; the state senior event was in Hyderabad on 28–29 Dec 2013

03District association letter says

No senior championship was conducted at Khammam on the dates printed on the certificates

COMPLETE RECORD NARRATIVE

From the documents to the unanswered question

01

What the certificates show

Each of the four sets contains a participation or merit certificate bearing the same senior-event title, the Khammam venue and the dates 19–21 October 2013. Applicant identities and personal details have been permanently removed from the public copies.

02

What the association records show

The Telangana Judo Association letter identifies the Khammam competition as a junior event and separately records the state senior championship at Hyderabad on 28–29 December 2013. The Khammam District Judo Association letter also says a senior championship was not held there on the dates printed on these certificates.

03

The unanswered verification question

If these records were used in sports-quota scrutiny, which original event register and which association confirmation did the verification team rely on? The complete verification trail—not another verbal assurance—is needed to reconcile the contradiction.

WHAT THE FILES ESTABLISH
  • Four anonymised certificate sets carry the same senior-event description and Khammam dates.
  • Two supplied association letters give a materially different account of the event category and senior-event schedule.
  • The public packet preserves the event details needed for comparison while removing applicant identifiers.
WHY IT MATTERS

Sports-quota selection depends on the authenticity, category and date of an achievement. A junior/senior mismatch can change eligibility and therefore requires a documented re-check.

RECORDS THAT MUST BE RELEASED

Release the original applications, source-register entries, association verification requests and replies, evaluator notes, decision sheets and signed approval trail for these four anonymised records.

PERMANENTLY ANONYMISED EXHIBITS

Inspect the supporting records

Names, candidate IDs, dates of birth, family details, signatures and other identifying information are permanently removed from these public copies.

Khammam 2013 · Junior/senior record conflict · Evidence packet12 pages · 2.1 MB · SHA-256 6cad5a838b28…
Download PDF